Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Plans

This may begin with prose, and expand into something like a project plan at some point. This need not be a complete schedule, but it will make sense to include the steps and approaches, milestones, etc.

Dependencies

As mentioned in the description of Nuxeo and the Nuxeo Analysis, the Nuxeo framework incorporates support for both authentication (AuthN) and authorization (AuthZ).

As a minor form of advance preparation for the possibility, however remote, that the Services Team may encounter issues - such as documentation shortcomings, implementation difficulties, or missing capabilities - in this support, one widely and favorably discussed alternative in the Java security frameworks space appears to be:

  • JSecurity.

    JSecurity is billed on its About page as "extremely easy to use and understand. An evaluating developer should grasp all the fundamentals within 10 minutes." (If true, this may enable us to fairly rapidly evaluate its approach and capabilities, vis a vis Nuxeo's integral security support.) It is "POJO and interface based ... you can use it in any pojo container, servlet container, J2EE application server, or standalone application out of the box." This framework is licensed under an Apache 2.0 license, which may potentially be compatible with CollectionSpace licensing requirements.

Test Plan

This should describe how the new service implementation will be tested. The testing here could include white box style test, unit test, and/or integration tests.

Data Models

  • No labels