Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Cataloging screen, Material repeating field group: Lynn notes "...we might want a display version of this field, or some form of free-form entry. It seems like the radio-button indicates that only 1 will be displayed. Is this maybe what the 'physical description' field is for (materials display?)"  We could look at CDWA and VRA Core 4 as well to see if we have the right fields for data sharing. 
  • Cataloging screen, Production Place repeating field group: Lynn notes "...could we maybe call this 'location' instead? ... Also, could we include a display version of this too, which would include the parents."  Do we have the right fields for CDWA and VRA Core 4?  Place hierarchy will be available  if the Place authority is used here, but we might need Verbatim Place field of some kind.
  • Cataloging screen, Production Person repeating field group: Lynn notes "Could we combine these as creator?"  Do we have the right fields for CDWA and VRA Core 4?
  • Media Handling screen, Publisher and Contributor fields.  How do those relate to Source (which will probably be based on multiple authorities)? Again, do we have the right fields for CDWA and VRA Core 4?
  • Do we need a Classification field?
  • How do we model the authority or authorities for "Sources".  Often these will be citations, but they could also be vendors, donors, or other things.  Probably we will want multiple authorities, but this needs discussion with HAVRC and CEDVRC.

...