SMK Citation Authority Requirements

This page contains SMK's original requirements/schema for the Citation Autohrity (and history see below):

Information Group	Globus Field name	Fine Arts Extension (CDWA)	SMK Extension	Data Type	Repeatable	Remarks
Citation Authority	Accessionsnr.	Citation authority record ID		Controlled number	No
	Forfatter, fornavn/efternavn	Source author		Name authority - all	Yes
	Forfatter, funktionsbetegnelse		Source author > role	Controlled list	Yes?	Could this field be substituted by adopting CS/CDWA practice and use the field Editor/Compiler (Name Authority) instead?
	Hoved titel	Source title		Text	No
	Undertitel		Source title > subtitle	Text	No
	Udgave	Source edition statement		Text	No
	Udgivelsessted	Source publication place		Place authority	Yes
	Forlag	Source publisher		Name authority - all	Yes
	År	Source publication year		Date units of information	No
	Monografi som værtspublikation/Tidsskrift som værtspublikation	Source broader title		Text	No
	Forfatter til værtspublikation		Source broader title > author/editor	Name authority	Yes
	Nr.		Source broader title > issue number	Text	No
	Tidsskriftsdatering		Source broader title > publication date	Date units of information	No
	Tidsskrift sidetal		Source broader title > pagination	Text	No
	ISBN		ISBN	Text	No
	ISSN		ISSN	Text	No
	Udstilling		Exhibition	Text or Exhibition authority	No
	Note	Remarks		Text box	No
	Pladssignatur		Placement number	Text	No

The CS Citation Authority Schema is derived from CDWA with only the Citation Authority record ID missing. The Citation Authority will not be part of the Core development within a foreseeable future.

(Update October 16th, 2012: Berkeley will now start building a Citation Authority to an extended schema, that also reflects and exceeds our requirements. UCB expects to contribute this to the CS community within three months). Update December 14th, 2012: Berkeley did not build this authority so we may have to build it ourselves. If we do so we will build the authority to the UCB schema even though it contains a number of fields for which we have no use, since it will make the authority usable for community at large and since the workload is not overwhelming. Update February 14th, 2013: We ended up building the Citation Authority to the UCB Schema - see main page.

Question: Why not make the Source Broader title a Citation Authority Record itself? I.e. all articles in a publication would then be related to the same 'mother publication' instead of appearing in a text field in each source record. we would stille need the Source Broader Title sub-fields of: Issue number, publication date, and pagination for each source record - but not the author/editor. *NB: *This is the solution proposed by UCB, and we will go along with that (i.e. mapping needs to be updated; DONE).